
Conservation status: Vulnerable
Description: A large species of gecko growing to a body length of 147mm with a tail approximately as long as the body. Moderately broad toes with extensive webbing, and loose folds of skin along the ventro-lateral margin of the body. The colour pattern highly variable, with a mottling of lichenous grey-green and white on browns of varying hues.
Natural distribution: Known from a few scattered locations on the main island, the Ile des Pins, and the Belep Islands.
Distribution within Province Sud: Recorded from the Ile des Pins in the late 1800's, Mt Mou in 1925, and recently from Sarramea at the base of Plateau de Dogney.
Distribution within Province Nord: Recorded from several locations in the Valle d'Amoa north of Poindimie, and recently from two locations in the north-west near Koumac, and the Belep Islands.
Threats:
Conservation status: Rhacodactylus chahoua is recorded from only two locations in the far north of the main island and the outlying Belep Islands, 5 locations across the southern and central areas of the main island, and another from Ile des Pins. These represent seven widely disjunct sub-populations with an area of occupancy <1000 km2. Recent field research has extended the species range in the north of the island, and the broad distribution of records indicates the species is more widespread than previously thought, however its distribution is still likely to remain as scattered isolated populations with a low overall area of occurrence.
Most recent records have been from low elevation forest, particularly riverine (near a river) or valley forest. Low elevation closed forest has been greatly reduced or modified through the activities of humans, both pre and post European occupation. Clearing for subsistence agriculture has severely impacted upon forest in coastal and near coastal areas of the east coast. Low elevation forest on the west coast has also undergone extensive alteration and disturbance by grazing activities. As such the species is likely to have already suffered a significant reduction in range, and to have a highly fragmented area of occupancy.
These factors in combination with the range of threats identified above, and the specialised biology of the species, indicate it can conservatively be categorised as Vulnerable, but could be moved to a higher level of conservation concern given the number and intensity of those threats.
Future research required:
![]()
Copyright © Australian Museum, 2002
